Georgiana Mititelu vs Clarissa Blomqvist Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 Sep at 10:38 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Mititelu vs C. Blomqvist

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FIN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Mititelu 1 - 0 Blomqvist
They have played 2 sets in total, with Georgiana Mititelu winning 2 and Clarissa Blomqvist winning 0. The last match between Georgiana Mititelu and Clarissa Blomqvist was at the W35 Reims, 29-09-2025, Round: Q2, Surface: I.hard, with Georgiana Mititelu getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mititelu | 1 |
| Blomqvist | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q2) W35 Reims(09-29-25)
G. Mititelu vs C. Blomqvist H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 25.00% (4-12) | Career Total W/L | 53.57% (45-39) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
G. Mititelu vs C. Blomqvist Match Preview:
- Clarissa Blomqvist has a lower second serve win percentage (32.15%) compared to Georgiana Mititelu (41.44%). Could this indicate a weakness for Blomqvist in serving? It might suggest so.
- In terms of returning, Blomqvist has a slight edge, winning 55.61% of her opponents' second serve points against Mititelu's 53.49%.
- When saving breakpoints, Blomqvist leads with 45.81%, just ahead of Mititelu's 42.86%, indicating better resilience under pressure.
- Blomqvist has had a more successful year overall, winning 51.22% of her matches, compared to Mititelu's 27.27% win rate.
- On different surfaces, Blomqvist excels on Hard court with a 57% win rate, whereas Mititelu’s best comes on Indoor Hard court with a much lower 33% win rate.
- Blomqvist generally plays in Futures/Satellites with a 51.35% win record, while Mititelu competes in higher-level Challengers, albeit with a lower win rate of 27.27%.
- The average ranking of Blomqvist's opponents is slightly higher (355.73) than Mititelu's (373), suggesting Blomqvist may face tougher competition.
- In deciding sets, Blomqvist boasts a higher success rate (44%) compared to Mititelu's 25%, which might be crucial if the match is tight.
- Considering current event performance and past data is key. Blomqvist's overall stats suggest she might have the upper hand in this match.
Editorial Prediction (September 29, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent performance patterns and strengths of both players, Clarissa Blomqvist appears to have a competitive edge, particularly with her higher ability to win when facing breakpoints and performing in deciding sets.
Although Georgiana Mititelu has demonstrated stronger second serve statistics, Blomqvist's overall match success rate, especially on winning surfaces and against tougher opponents, places her slightly ahead.
Considering the various metrics, Clarissa Blomqvist is likely to emerge as the winner of the upcoming match, given her consistent records and advantageous recent performance trends.
Georgiana Mititelu vs Clarissa Blomqvist Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. Mititelu vs C. Blomqvist H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:18:26 | Average Match Time | 1:18:26 |
| 64% (39/61) | 1st Serve % | 46% (22/48) |
| 69% (27/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (13/22) |
| 64% (14/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (11/26) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 50% (24/48) | Return Points Win % | 33% (20/61) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
G. Mititelu Recent Matches Played
C. Blomqvist Recent Matches Played

G. Mititelu vs C. Blomqvist Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25.00% (4/12) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.57% (45/39) |
| 34.21% (13/25) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.50% (105/95) |
| 43.55% (162/210) | Games Win/Loss | 50.61% (954/931) |
| 28.57% (2/5) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.17% (16/13) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.81% (24/19) |
| 25.00% (2/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 41.67% (5/7) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 13 | Aces Total | 51 |
| 0.44 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.43 |
| 79 | Total Double Faults | 397 |
| 1:27:40 | Average Match Time | 1:25:3 |
| 390.19 | Average Opponent Rank | 331.85 |
| 59% (564/956) | 1st Serve % | 64% (2925/4600) |
| 59% (330/564) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (1671/2925) |
| 43% (167/392) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (667/1675) |
| 52% (48/93) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (307/606) |
| 44% (397/910) | Return Points Win % | 48% (2241/4696) |
| 25.00% (4/12) | Challenger W/L | 33.33% (3/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 56.00% (42/33) |
| 25% (4/16) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (45/84) |
| 50% (2/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (8/14) |
| 17% (1/6) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (17/32) |
| 57% (7/4) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (43/40) |
| 43% (7/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (43/3) |
| 0% (9/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (41/5) |